101 lines
5.6 KiB
Markdown
101 lines
5.6 KiB
Markdown
这是一个非常棒的切入点！你提供的雷达图直观地展示了“省电模式”与“高性能模式”的硬性割裂（Trade-off）。要拿到MCM的O/F奖，**仅仅展示这种割裂是不够的，核心在于打破这种二元对立，建立一个连续的、动态的控制模型。**
|
||
|
||
你需要建立的是一个**“基于效用最大化的自适应动态控制策略” (Utility-Maximization Adaptive Control Strategy, UM-ACS)**。
|
||
|
||
我们可以利用你在 `模型3.md` 中建立的电池物理模型（SOC, 等），结合这张雷达图的概念，构建一个第四问的数学模型。
|
||
|
||
以下是为你设计的建模思路、数学公式和论文段落。
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### **核心建模思路：从“二选一”到“最优控制”**
|
||
|
||
1. **量化雷达图：** 将雷达图的五个维度定义为状态变量，它们是控制变量 的函数。
|
||
2. **引入控制变量 ：** 定义一个连续变量 ，代表“激进程度”。
|
||
* ：纯省电模式（Green Polygon）。
|
||
* ：纯高性能模式（Red Polygon）。
|
||
* ：中间混合状态。
|
||
|
||
|
||
3. **建立目标函数（Utility Function）：** 我们需要在每一时刻 寻找最优的 ，使得**用户体验收益**减去**电量焦虑惩罚**的值最大。
|
||
4. **动态反馈：** 随着电量（SOC）下降，**电量焦虑惩罚**权重增加，系统自动迫使 向 0 滑动，从而实现你所说的“自动动态调整”。
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### **正式建模内容 (可直接用于论文第四部分)**
|
||
|
||
#### **4. Adaptive Power Management Strategy Based on Utility Optimization**
|
||
|
||
Traditional power management forces users to choose between two static extremes: "Power Saver" and "High Performance" (as shown in Figure 4). This binary approach is inefficient because user needs and battery status fluctuate continuously. We propose a **Continuous Adaptive Control Model** that dynamically optimizes the trade-off between User Experience (UX) and Battery Sustainability.
|
||
|
||
#### **4.1. Definition of Control Space and Metrics**
|
||
|
||
Let be the **Performance Aggressiveness Coefficient**, which serves as the continuous control variable connecting the two modes in the radar chart.
|
||
|
||
We map the radar chart metrics to using linear interpolation (a valid simplification for control logic):
|
||
|
||
1. **Performance Index:**
|
||
2. **Display Quality:**
|
||
3. **Connectivity:**
|
||
4. **User Experience (UX):** Defined as the weighted sum of the above functional metrics:
|
||
|
||
where is strictly increasing with .
|
||
5. **Power Consumption Cost:** Conversely, higher performance implies higher power drain. Based on our Model 3 equation (), the power consumption is:
|
||
|
||
|
||
#### **4.2. The "Battery Anxiety" Feedback Mechanism**
|
||
|
||
To make the model compliant with reality, the system implies a "cost" for using power. This cost is not constant; it depends on the current State of Charge, (from Model 3).
|
||
|
||
We define the **Marginal Cost of Energy (MCE)**, denoted as . This represents the user's "battery anxiety."
|
||
|
||
* When (100% battery), energy is "cheap," anxiety is low ( is small).
|
||
* When (Low battery), energy is "expensive," anxiety is infinite ( is large).
|
||
|
||
We model this as a convex barrier function:
|
||
|
||
Where is a scaling factor and controls how sharply anxiety rises as battery drops.
|
||
|
||
#### **4.3. The Optimization Objective (The "Smart" Logic)**
|
||
|
||
At any time instance , the operating system solves the following optimization problem to determine the optimal mode :
|
||
|
||
**Interpretation:**
|
||
|
||
* **High SOC:** is small. The gain dominates. The system chooses (High Performance Mode).
|
||
* **Low SOC:** becomes huge. The penalty term dominates. The system is forced to choose (Power Saver Mode) to minimize , regardless of the user's desire for performance.
|
||
|
||
#### **4.4. Closed-Loop Solution**
|
||
|
||
Solving , we can derive the dynamic switching logic. Since and are linear in , the derivative is constant for a given . However, to make it smoother (more realistic O-level modeling), we assume diminishing returns on User Experience (e.g., or ).
|
||
|
||
Assuming a logarithmic utility (diminishing returns for ultra-high performance), the optimal control law becomes:
|
||
|
||
This equation is the mathematical embodiment of your **"Automatic Dynamic Adjustment."** It continuously outputs the optimal mix of the Red and Green polygons based on the real-time battery level .
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### **针对O奖的“点睛之笔” (Visual & Analysis)**
|
||
|
||
为了拿到O奖，你需要在论文中加入对这个模型的**可视化分析**（利用你上传的图的概念）：
|
||
|
||
**建议你在论文中加入这样一段描述（Visual Interpretation）：**
|
||
|
||
> "Figure 4 shows the static boundaries. Our model creates a **dynamic breathing polygon** that interpolates between the Green and Red zones.
|
||
> * **Phase 1 (SOC > 60%):** The polygon adheres to the Red boundary (High Performance).
|
||
> * **Phase 2 (20% < SOC < 60%):** The polygon shrinks smoothly. The system automatically dims the screen () and caps the CPU frequency () proportionally to .
|
||
> * **Phase 3 (SOC < 20%):** The 'Battery Anxiety' factor diverges, forcing the polygon to collapse to the Green boundary (Power Saver), prioritizing survival over experience."
|
||
>
|
||
>
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### **如何整合进你的现有回答 (p4_response)?**
|
||
|
||
你需要替换或增强 `p4_response.md` 中的 **"Recommendations"** 部分。原稿主要是文字建议，现在你要把它升级为**"System Design"**。
|
||
|
||
**操作步骤：**
|
||
|
||
1. **保留**原稿中关于“屏幕亮度影响最大”的结论（这是物理事实）。
|
||
2. **插入**上述模型（4.1 - 4.4节）。
|
||
3. **结论升级：** 你的建议不再是简单的“用户应该降低亮度”，而是“手机厂商应该部署这套 **-Adaptive Control Algorithm**”。 |